Anita Sarkeesian and Zoe

And how can we avoid a potential conflict of interest, but the main aim of the movement is to open channels for discussion and revise the current standards discontinued the proceedings in the press game Dofus. Although the main aim is perfectly legitimate and contains a large number of this type and attention to different sounds largely behind him, and this allowed the mysterious rampant and that can not be justified with the glove to slide, climate predators by shedding frantic take on perceived goals. While this type of behavior can not be tolerated, it is tragic, especially when circumstances play out the way Frank Center has.At its history, Jane Frank received a violent reaction http://www.shopdofus.com to an article published by The Guardian, how to attack a woman who works in video games. The material is sympathetic, and an invitation to follow the level headed and reasonable approach to abuses against women such as Anita Sarkeesian and Zoe Quinn. Do you agree with what you say here, the atmosphere was unstable place, it can not be denied, at the time of publication and turned violent and undeserved act almost immediately. This revelation comes real problems' that Frank was known and supporting Zoe Quinn to a small extent, which broke out at the beginning through the image transmitted by InternetAristocrat. In addition, it was suggested to have a relationship with Anita Sarkeesian shortly after the two met some time ago.The only problem is that people who work in the gaming industry, and tend to intersect with others who work in the industry Dofus Games . You do not need to be in close cooperation already met someone! In addition, Frank actually not include the original evacuation in an article that is fully transparent in this little emphasis on Quinn, and it was the first article was ever discussed or work. Guardian editor-in-themselves actively remove her not to disclose, believing that it is unnecessary, since the article (by their standards) does not affect the implementation of ethics. After the amazing and quite frankly disgusting and wrong harassment Frank suffered as a result of this article, the editors said in the Guardian that contract without work, * was attached to a note in the September 5, 2014: the previous footnote, inflicting on 1 September, it became clear that Jane Frank It has been purchased and is an advocate of the work of Zoe Quinn, despite the fact that it is the first article written on the developer and Frank also met briefly Anita Sarkeesian. These facts were disclosed as a footnote Frank Jen lifted when the copy before publication, but removed by the editors because they do not meet the criteria for 'substantial connection' in accordance with the directives of the Guardian editorial.